Enemies of Mimetic Essence: Lacoue-Labarthe As we can see, Derrida clearly regards mimesis as representation, although mimetic representation has no. Deleuze and Lacoue-Labarthe on the Reversal of Platonism: The Mimetic Abyss. David Lane. Among Friedrich Nietzsche’s many daring philosophical declara-. Renaissance world, as Lacoue-Labarthe suggests) and has nothing to do with the role of mimesis in musical expression. It concerns, rather, a question of.
|Published (Last):||12 March 2017|
|PDF File Size:||12.36 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There is also something supplemental about imitation, as it is different from the thing that is imitated. History of Western Philosophy.
The productive force of mimesis can be seen as the way in which it multiplicates images, words, thoughts and actions without becoming tangible itself. Lacoie-labarthe privilege of the spoken word, as both origin and self-preserved truth, needs to be deconstructed, while mimesis actually prevents the unproblematic reference to the ideal, the essence.
The essence in every repetition is, according to Deleuze, non-mediated difference. Derrida’s Love of Philosophy: Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter. Mimesis is originary, even, in my view, primary to violence, and the primal force in cultural evolution. Derrida, in the tradition of Heidegger, claims that truth as a metaphysical referent is something outside of the philosophical realm.
For Derrida there is no first writing, only different imitations or repetitions of previous texts.
Sexuality and Narrative Judith Roof Limited preview – On the contrary, I would say, it is only now that one can truly begin to appreciate the groundbreaking status of these essays. Life seems to be devoid of anything originary, and of any inherent qualities.
Derrida mimesks Girard, however, tend to use mimesis differently. Silverman – – Research in Phenomenology 15 1: As we have seen, Girard operates with a concept of doubling, one which takes place only in the later phases of mimetic desire. Find it on Scholar. Everything begins with mijesis. Philosopher, literary critic, translator of Nietzsche and BenjaminPhilippe Lacoue-Labarthe is one of the leading intellectual figures in France.
For Girard this would mean imitation without any engendering, which again would mean no mimesis. Denegation and Identification in Freud. lacoue-lanarthe
Typography — Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Christopher Fynsk | Harvard University Press
On the other hand, there is enormous scope within the deconstructionist project for destructing the philosophic and theological tradition, even for attempting to deconstruct the metaphysics of the humanistic sciences as a whole.
Also, acts of imitation among some modern literary critics seem to be seen as something one can freely adopt and which differs from the original. Lacoue-Labarthe shows, through various explorations of the link between philosophy and literature, that this subjectal return doubles and paralyzes itself. Stagings of Mimesis an Interview. Mimesis on the Move: The supplement also refers to originality; it could even be labelled as the most original, and therefore the most liable for expulsion.
Philippe Lacoue-LabartheChristopher Fynsk.
Plato Pursued: Mimesis, Decision, and the Subject – Fordham Scholarship
This volume of six essays deals with the relation between philosophy and aesthetics, particularly the role of mimesis in a metaphysics of representation Mimesis in the Works of Girard and Derrida.
Derrida and the Deconstruction of Mimesis. Every imitation is a supplementsomething distinct from that which is imitated. By making mimesis an essence, Girard betrays mimesis by making it a property, he claims.
Girard, as a religious thinker, considers reality as basically something a priori and attainable, while Lacoue-Labarthe clearly sees reality as something construed, claiming that maintaining the religious means the denial of representation, as this denial is belief.
At the same time, there has been a profound discovery of the scientific and structural value of literary texts, which really consists in the deconstruction of certain positivistic ideals, which, since the 19 th century, apparantly enhanced lacoue-pabarthe science.
According to Lacoue-Labarthe, Girard objects to the view that mimesis contains representation and can be controlled by a process of representation — or re presentation. Derrida is far from being a positivist.
Desire in Derrida’s thinking does not seem to be so decisive that representation becomes secondary, which is the case in Girard’s work. Don’t have an account?
Mimesis in the works of Derrida and Girard plays a decisive role. The second, intertwined with the first, is in fact instrumental in stimulating the rigor with which the first develops.
The supplement can, in certain expressions, be seen as the original. It would be more accurate to say that representational mimesis refers to originary mimesis, which is mimetic desire. Sign in to use this feature.
Representation and the Loss of the Subject. Together with the introduction, these essays are essential reading for anyone interested in Heidegger, postmodernism, and the history of mimesis in philosophy and literature. And the imitative side of writing materializes in the fact that Plato began writing after the death of Socrates, imitating and representing his thoughts.